Landmark Cheque Bounce Judgments-  Supreme Court & High Court | BLJ Legal

Supreme Court and High Court Landmark Judgments on Cheque Bounce Cases (Section 138 NI Act)

Explore a curated selection of landmark cheque bounce judgments delivered by the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts, including the Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, Allahabad High Court, Punjab & Haryana High Court, and more. These rulings address crucial legal questions related to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, including:

• Presumption under Sections 138 & 139

• Jurisdiction to file cheque bounce cases

• Criminal liability of directors & partners (Section 141)

• Post-dated cheques and security cheques

• Compounding of cheque bounce offences

• Dishonor of cheques issued as loan repayments

• Interim compensation under Section 143A

• Maintainability of proceedings after compromise

• Recalling summoning order

• Criminal appeals and revisions in cheque bounce cases

At BLJ Legal, we break down complex judicial interpretations into clear, actionable summaries—helping litigants, legal professionals, and law students navigate the evolving jurisprudence on cheque dishonor law. Whether you're in Delhi NCR, Ghaziabad, or anywhere in India, stay updated on how courts interpret and apply the NI Act in real-world cases.

Click on each case below to read full blog posts, including the facts, legal issues, court’s reasoning, and practical implications.

Our Blogs

Supreme Court Clarifies Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Bounce Cases: A Game-Changer for Section 138 NI Act Litigation 

Prakash Chimanlal Sheth vs. Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat (2025 INSC 897)

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Section 138 r/w Section 142(2)(a) – Territorial Jurisdiction –

The Supreme Court held that in cheque dishonor cases, territorial jurisdiction lies with the court where the payee maintains their bank account, not where the cheque is physically deposited. The decision clarifies that the place of collection or drawee bank is irrelevant if the cheque is presented through an account. This ruling ensures consistency in Section 138 proceedings and allows complainants to initiate legal action from their home jurisdiction. 

Common Questions We Help Address

• What are the legal remedies if a cheque is dishonored for insufficient funds?

• Can cheque bounce proceedings be quashed after settlement?

• What documents are needed to file a 138 NI Act complaint?

• Can directors or partners be prosecuted in cheque bounce cases?

• How to defend a false cheque bounce complaint?

Need Guidance on Cheque Bounce Matters? Connect with BLJ Legal

If you’re dealing with a cheque bounce case—whether as a complainant or an accused—the legal process can be complex and time-sensitive. At BLJ Legal, such matters are personally handled by Advocate Shasha Jain, a seasoned trial and appellate lawyer with expertise in 138 NI Act litigation.

Whether you need:

• Legal notice drafting

• Complaint filing under Section 138

• Defense strategy against false accusations

• Quashing of summons or criminal proceedings

• Representation before Magistrate Courts, High Courts, or Supreme Court

—we’re here to assist you with strategic and effective legal support.

BLJ Legal, co-led by Advocate Shasha Jain, is known for its result-oriented and client-focused approach across criminal and commercial litigation. If you're seeking a knowledgeable advocate or exploring your legal options in a cheque dishonor matter, we welcome you to reach out for a confidential consultation.

📍 Address: Chamber No. 314, Patiala House Court, Near India Gate, Supreme Court, New Delhi – 110001
📞 Phone: 8851632512
📧 Email: legalblj@gmail.com

Disclaimer: This message is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation of services.