Landmark Bail Judgments – Supreme Court & High Court | BLJ Legal
Looking for important bail judgments in India? Discover top Supreme Court and High Court decisions on anticipatory, regular, and default bail with case summaries by BLJ Legal.
Embedded Files
Do you have a legal query?
Supreme Court and High Courts Landmark Judgments on Bail
Supreme Court and High Courts Landmark Judgments on Bail
Explore a curated selection of landmark bail judgments delivered by the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts, including the Delhi High Court, Allahabad High Court, Bombay High Court, Punjab & Haryana High Court, and more. These judgments span across crucial bail-related issues such as:
Regular bail
Anticipatory bail
Regular bail after arrest
Default bail
Bail in economic offences
NDPS bail rulings
UAPA bail conditions
POCSO Act
Matrimonial disputes & domestic violence
Criminal appeals and interim relief
At BLJ Legal, we break down complex judicial interpretations into clear, practical summaries—offering legal insights that benefit litigants, law students, and criminal defense lawyers alike. Whether you're based in Delhi NCR, Ghaziabad, or anywhere across India, stay informed on how courts are shaping bail jurisprudence.
Click on each case below to read full blog posts, including the facts, legal issues, court’s reasoning, and implications.
Our Blogs
Gajanan Dattatray Gore vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 913)
Criminal Law – Bail – Financial Undertakings – Prohibited – The Supreme Court in Gajanan Dattatray Gore vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 913) held that no court shall grant regular or anticipatory bail based on the accused’s promise to deposit money or furnish a financial undertaking. Bail must be granted solely on legal merits such as the nature of the offence, risk of absconding, or tampering with evidence. This judgment ends the discriminatory practice of linking liberty with financial capability and mandates uniform compliance across all courts in India.(read more)
Criminal Law – Bail – Financial Undertakings – Prohibited – The Supreme Court in Gajanan Dattatray Gore vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 913) held that no court shall grant regular or anticipatory bail based on the accused’s promise to deposit money or furnish a financial undertaking. Bail must be granted solely on legal merits such as the nature of the offence, risk of absconding, or tampering with evidence. This judgment ends the discriminatory practice of linking liberty with financial capability and mandates uniform compliance across all courts in India.(read more)
Common Questions We Help Address:
Common Questions We Help Address:
How to apply for anticipatory bail in Delhi?
What is the process for regular bail after arrest?
Can I get default bail if the charge sheet is delayed?
Which advocate is best for bail in the Supreme Court or High Court?
Need Guidance on Bail Matters? Connect with BLJ Legal
Need Guidance on Bail Matters? Connect with BLJ Legal
Are you dealing with a legal situation involving anticipatory bail, regular bail, or default bail? At BLJ Legal, bail matters are personally handled by Advocate Tarun Lal, who brings extensive experience and courtroom strategy to every case. Whether it's urgent legal advice or detailed representation before trial courts, High Courts, or the Supreme Court, Tarun Lal is equipped to guide you through the process with clarity and precision.
BLJ Legal, co-led by Advocate Tarun Lal, is known for its result-driven and client-centric approach across a wide spectrum of criminal litigation. If you're exploring your legal options or seeking insights into the bail process, we welcome you to reach out. Contact us for a confidential consultation and protect your legal rights today.
📍 Address: Chamber No. 314, Patiala House Court, Near India Gate, Supreme Court, New Delhi 110001
📞 Phone: 8851632512
📧 Email: legalblj@gmail.com
Disclaimer: This message is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a solicitation of services.
"Bail is the rule; jail is the exception. Preserving personal liberty is a fundamental principle in the pursuit of justice. Bail, as the rule, affirms the essence of justice and the sanctity of personal liberty. It reminds us that, in the eyes of the law, freedom is not just a privilege but a birthright, and detention should only be the exception when all else fails."
Tarun Lal, Adv
Contact us
Contact us
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse